Skip to main content

Development and validation of an HPTLC-DPPH assay method for the acteoside content of Ribwort ipowder®

The French company PiLeJe Industrie develops liquid and dry plant-derived ingredients using patented procedures and in-house developed processes. Their products are mainly used in the food supplements industry. The long-term collaboration with Chromacim led to the important development of HPTLC in their laboratory. This article addresses the question, whether it is possible to validate the activity assay of one major compound through its activity only, using the best international current standard.

Introduction

Ribwort plantain (Plantago lanceolata L.) is a common grassland plant traditionally used for its therapeutic properties. The leaves are used in many European countries for the symptomatic treatment of colds and inflammation of the mouth and throat. Biological activities of P. lanceolata include antihistaminic, anti-spasmodic, anti-nociceptive, neuroprotective, metabolic, and gastro-protective activities. Acteoside is a phenyl-propanoid glycoside, well known for its antioxidant and antiinflammatory properties, which is commonly used as a marker.

Ribwort ipowder® is a plant infusion concentrated on plant totum, a proprietary 100% plant-based product developed by PiLeJe Industrie, made from dried P. lanceolata according to a patented process [1, 2]. Quantification was already shown with standard detection and published in a previous issue of the CBS. Our goal was to prove that this type of activity detection is reliable and transferable to quality assurance with a proper validation package. This needs a level of knowledge that we have developed rather quickly with the help of our partners. The objectives of this work were 1) to develop an HPTLC method using the 2,2-diphenyl 1-picrylhydrazyle (DPPH*) effect-directed chemical reaction for the detection of the antioxidant activity of acteoside for quality control of industrial dry extracts of P. lanceolata and 2) to demonstrate the applicability of the concept of Life Cycle Management of analytical methods to quantitative HPTLC-DPPH* methods.

Standard solution

An acteoside standard is dissolved in methanol at a concentration of 17.40 μg/mL in methanol.

Sample preparation

500 mg of Ribwort ipowder® (PiLeJe Industrie) are extracted with 40 mL of ethanol – water 50:50 (V/V) by sonication at 60 °C for 10 min, then filtered and transferred to a 50 mL volumetric flask and filled up to the mark. The solution is diluted 5-fold for application.

Chromatogram layer

HPTLC plates silica gel 60, 20 x 10 cm are used.

Sample application

4.0 μL of sample and standard solutions are applied as bands with the Automatic TLC Sampler (ATS 4), 20 tracks, band length 8.0 mm, distance from left edge 22.0 mm, distance from lower edge 8.0 mm.

Chromatography

Plates are developed with ethyl acetate – water – acetic acid – formic acid 100:27:11:11 (V/V) to 70 mm (from the lower edge) in the ADC 2 with chamber saturation (20 min, with filter paper) and after activation at 33 % relative humidity for 10 min using a saturated aqueous solution of magnesium chloride.

Post-chromatographic derivatization

After drying for 10 min, the plates are immersed into DPPH* reagent (0.5 mM methanolic solution of 2,2-diphenyl-1-picrylhydrazyl, immersion speed 5 cm/s, immersion time 5 s) with the Chromatogram Immersion Device 3. The plates are dried at room temperature in the dark for 90 s and then heated at 60 °C for 30 s (TLC Plate Heater 3).

Documentation

Images of the plates are captured with the TLC Visualizer in white light after derivatization.

Densitometry

Fluorescence mode is used for measurement at 517 nm (tungsten lamp) with TLC Scanner 4 and visionCATS to obtain a positive response of the peaks of interest.

Results and discussion

Analytical methods used for quality control of plants and plant extracts are usually based on the identification and quantification of chemical markers to manage batch reproducibility and efficacy. To measure the concentration of acteoside in Ribwort ipowder®, the HPTLC DDPH* assay was applied. The assay determines the free radical scavenging activity of the plant extract in solution.

Figure 1: Antioxidative properties - DPPH

Figure 1: Antioxidative properties – DPPH

The first step of this work was the selection of the Analytical Target Profile (ATP) and the determination of the Target Measurement Uncertainty (TMU) taking into account the quality control requirements for such extracts and the applicable range of the detection method. Once the desired range was established, an evaluation of the calibration function was conducted using linear, 1/x and 1/x2 weighted linear calibration models and those three models were used to assess accuracy of the method (trueness and precision) by means of accuracy profiles [3]. The 1/x2 weighted linear calibration function showed the best performance in the tested range, both in terms of accuracy and uncertainty of measurement.

Figure 2: Accuracy profiles obtained with the selected calibration function, for each function the accuracy limits are given by the vertical doted lines

Figure 2: Accuracy profiles obtained with the selected calibration function, for each function the accuracy limits are given by the vertical doted lines

The method requirement was to assay acteoside amounts around 1.0–2.0% (W/W) in industrial dry extracts of Ribwort plantain with an acceptance criterion of ± 20.0% difference to the true value for the ATP (defined as the combination of the trueness (bias) and precision characteristics), and a TMU of less than 20.0–25.0% relative uncertainty, according to the quality control needs.

Figure 3: HPTLC chromatogram in white light and densitograms measured in fluorescence mode at 517 nm with a tungsten lamp after DPPH* assay of standards and plantain leaf extract

Figure 3: HPTLC chromatogram in white light and densitograms measured in fluorescence mode at 517 nm with a tungsten lamp after DPPH* assay of standards and plantain leaf extract

Due to the lack of reference samples, spiked samples were used to evaluate the accuracy of the method by means of Total Analytical Error (TAE) determination, using prediction intervals calculation for the selected calibration functions. For quality control, the calibration function with the best performance level in accordance with the product specifications was chosen by estimating the Measurement Uncertainty (MU).

As Life Cycle Management of the method also includes its routine use, the MU was checked on spiked and non-spiked extract samples at different dilution levels, in order to verify the accordance of results between those samples, and to prepare a replication strategy for the routine method. Statistical calculations were performed with NeoLiCy® software for analytical methods’ life cycle statistical assessment (NeoLiCy, Marseille- Mâcon, France). The tested dilutions did not show any significant effect on the calculated spiked amount and any significant impact on the extract calculated concentrations. To take care of the measurement dispersion we included repeated sample preparation and measurement in the analytical procedure.

This work demonstrated that the concept of Life Cycle Management of analytical methods can successfully be applied to a HPTLC-DPPH* method, even in the case of complex matrices such as plant extracts, from the definition of the ATP and TMU to the reflection on the replication strategy to be applied in quality control.

The method developed for the quantification of acteoside in Ribwort plantain is applicable in a working range from 75.0 to 225.0 ng of acteoside and fit for purpose for use in quality control laboratories.

This study showed the suitability of HPTLC in this domain. Furthermore, the partnership with Chromacim and NéoLiCy showed its efficiency, within a cumulative working time of less than two weeks only, including statistics and matrix effect evaluation. This method is therefore ready to be transferred to the quality control laboratory of the PiLeJe Group.

This success proves that we were initially right to select this approach and encourages us to continue in this powerful way to develop HPTLC as a relevant technique for our needs.

Literature

[1] Dubourdeaux, M. Procédé de Préparation d’extraits Végétaux Permettant l’obtention d’une Nouvelle Forme Galénique. 14 January 2009. Available at https://patents.google.com/patent/EP2080436A2/en, accessed on January 21, 2021)
[2] V. Bardot et al. (2020) Food Funct, https://doi.org/10.1039/c9fo01144g
[3] J.M. Roussel et al. (2021) J Chromtogr B, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jchromb.2021.122923

Further information on request from the authors.

Contact: Dr. Valérie Bardot, Naturopôle Nutrition Santé, Les Tiolans, 03800 Saint-Bonnet de Rochefort, France, v.bardot@pileje.com

mentioned products

The following products were used in this case study

Continue reading

HPTLC routine analysis using complementary developing solvents

Introduction

In quality control with HPTLC, a specific method using optimized developing solvents is generally used for each kind of sample. In order to simplify routine analysis, the lab team at CAMAG has developed the complementary developing solvents (CDS) concept based on one solvent of low polarity (LPDS), one of medium polarity (MPDS), and one of high polarity (HPDS). With these three developing solvents (DS), each on a separate plate and targeting compounds of different polarity, the same complex sample could be spread over up to three times the separation distance on a single plate, making available more information about the sample’s composition. Single substances can be characterized with three RF values instead of one. Even though this approach triples the analytical workload (3 analyses instead of one), it may be considered, that routine work with multiple and diverse samples can be simplified and maintenance of methods, plates, solvents and standards can be kept to a minimum, particularly if the process is automated. Identification of individual compounds will be more certain. A further advantage of the concept is that all samples can be compared with any other sample that has been previously analyzed with the same CDS and data could be compiled in a database for treatment with advanced algorithms.

In their paper [1] the researchers at CAMAG describe the development, validation and application of a CDS, applicable to a large number of very diverse samples including individual compounds and complex herbal materials. In combination with thorough standardization, the concept could help positioning HPTLC as a very powerful, general, and medium to high throughput technique for routine analysis and sophisticated research.

Figure 1: Visualization of the CDS and its fingerprints

Visualization of the CDS and its fingerprints

Standard solutions

The Universal HPTLC mix (UHM) was prepared in house according to [2]. With the UHM, HPTLC laboratories have a single solution, applicable as system suitability test to a wide range of chromatographic systems.

Sample preparation

Powdered herbal drugs and finished products were prepared in methanol using 10 min sonication followed by 5 min centrifugation. Ginkgo biloba, Camellia sinensis, Styphnolobium japonica and Piper nigrum were prepared at 100 mg/mL, Curcuma longa at 66.7 mg/mL, Angelica samples at 200 mg/mL, and the poly-herbal formulation at 50 mg/mL.

Chromatogram layer

HPTLC plates silica gel 60 F254 (Merck), 20 x 10 cm are used.

Sample application

Samples are applied as bands with the Automatic TLC Sampler (ATS 4), 15 tracks, band length 8.0 mm, distance from left edge 20.0 mm, distance from lower edge 8.0 mm.

Chromatography

Plates were developed with the three developing solvents in the ADC 2 with activation of the plate at 33% relative humidity for 10 min using a saturated solution of magnesium chloride. LPDS was used without saturation, whereas MPDS and HPDS were used with 20 min chamber saturation (with filter paper). The developing distance for all three methods was 70 mm (from the lower edge). Plates were dried for 5 min.

Post-chromatographic derivatization

Natural product (NP) reagent (1.0 g of 2-aminoethyl diphenylborinate in 100.0 mL of methanol) is used as derivatization reagent for the identification of Camelia sinensis, Styphnolobium japonicum and Ginkgo biloba. For Ginkgo biloba, the derivatization with NP is followed by anisaldehyde sulfuric acid (AS) reagent [slowly and carefully 170.0 mL of ice-cooled methanol are mixed with 20.0 mL of acetic acid and 10.0 mL of sulfuric acid; mixture is allowed to cool to room temperature, then 1.0 mL of anisaldehyde (p-methoxybenzaldehyde) is added]. Only AS reagent is used for the identification of Curcuma longa and Piper nigrum.

Documentation

Images are captured with the TLC Visualizer 2 in UV 254 nm, UV 366 nm, and white light prior to derivatization, and UV 366 nm, and white light after derivatization (when needed).

Densitometry

For the system suitability test using the UHM, TLC Scanner 4 and visionCATS are used in absorbance mode at 254 nm and in fluorescence mode at 366>/400 nm, with slit dimension 5.00 x 0.20 mm and scanning speed of 50 mm/s.

Results and discussion

The solvents selected for the CDS had to meet the following criteria: be of minimal hazard, stable, and easily available, to cover all selectivity groups according to Snyder, and include a broad range of polarity. The composition and properties of the CDS are shown in the table.

Table 1: Composition and properties of the CDSs

Composition and properties of the CDSs

The power of the CDS concept is illustrated with HPTLC fingerprints for identification of herbal drugs, herbal products, and poly-herbal formulations. Green tea leaves, for example, produce a different fingerprint with each of the DS zooming into specific polarities of the sample composition. The composite fingerprint gives complementary information emulating an extended developing distance.

Figure 2: HPTLC fingerprints of green tea leaves obtained with the CDS

HPTLC fingerprints of green tea leaves obtained with the CDS

HPTLC can easily detect adulteration of one herbal drug with another, using optimized developing solvents. For example, a method from the HPTLC Association [3] detects adulteration of Ginkgo biloba leaves with fruits of Styphnolobium japonicum. The CDS achieves the same goal, but offers even more certainty based on the data obtained with MPDS and HPDS.

Detection of 20% Styphnolobium japonicum fruit in Ginkgo biloba leaves with method [3] and CDS

Detection of 20% Styphnolobium japonicum fruit in Ginkgo biloba leaves with method [3] and CDS

Poly-herbal formulations such as products containing Curcuma longa and Piper nigrum are generally identified based on specific markers. The CDS can identify with certainty the presence of curcuminoids for turmeric and piperine for black pepper.

Fingerprints of Curcuma longa and Piper nigrum in comparison to those of two poly-herbal products

Fingerprints of Curcuma longa and Piper nigrum in comparison to those of two poly-herbal products

The CDS has been qualified using the universal HPTLC mix (UHM). A maximum margin of error of 0.014 was determined for the relevant zones.

Separation of the UHM components with the CDS

Separation of the UHM components with the CDS

Conclusion

The examples above illustrate the potential of the CDS for replacing the established methods for identification of herbal materials. Additional information concerning the chromatographic behavior of representative substances from different chemical classes is presented in the original paper [1]. When combined with fully automated chromatography, the CDS concept may become the basis for new applications of HPTLC in routine analysis and sophisticated research.

Literature

[1] T.K.T. Do et al. (2022) JPC, https://doi.org/10.1007/s00764-022-00185-1.
[2] T.K.T. Do et al. (2021) J. Chromatogr. A. 1638, https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2020.461830.
[3] HPTLC Association, Identification method of Ginkgo biloba, Leaf and leaf extract (flavonoids), (n.d.). https://www.hptlc-association.org/methods/methods_ for_identification_of_herbals.cfm.

Further information on request from the authors.

Contact: Dr. Tiên Do, CAMAG, Sonnenmattstrasse 11, 4132 Muttenz, Switzerland, tien.do@camag.com

mentioned products

The following products were used in this case study

Continue reading

HPTLC – a useful tool for the characterization of enzymes from plant lipid metabolism

The Jean-Pierre Bourgin Institute (IJPB) is the largest center for plant biology at the National Research Institute for Agriculture, Food and Environment (INRAE). It combines resources and multidisciplinary skills in the areas of biology, chemistry, and mathematics. Located in Versailles, it is a Joint Research Unit between INRAE and AgroParisTech. The DYSCOL (Dynamics and structure of Lipid Droplets) team studies various aspects of lipid accumulation in seeds from oil crops and model plants. The Kennedy pathway allows storage of fatty acids in eukaryotes in the form of triacylglycerols (TAG), through successive acylation of a glycerol backbone by acyltransferases. Hundreds of different fatty acids are found in plants. The different fatty acids incorporated into vegetable oils confer them specific physical, chemical and nutritional properties. DGATs (diacylglycerol acyltransferases) incorporate the final fatty acid in position sn-3 of the glycerol skeleton. They catalyze the rate-limiting step of the whole pathway. Due to their impact on oil yield and quality, DGATs are targets of interest for oil engineering. We aimed to identify candidate proteins as DGATs and to understand their substrate specificity. We used various approaches based on recombinant protein expression in different hosts, and analysis of the products of the reaction by complementary approaches, GC and HPTLC.

Introduction

Historically, demonstration of DGAT activity used radioactive precursors of substrates [1] followed by tedious extraction of the products (TAGs) [2] and quantification by liquid scintillation counting. Trans-methylation of TAGs produces fatty acid methyl esters, subsequently extracted, then separated and analyzed by GC. Alternatively, extraction of TAGs by improved methods and their separation from other cellular constituents by TLC is a convenient method avoiding radioactivity. Derivatization permits direct identification and quantification of the TAGs by comparison with standards.

HPTLC represents a valuable improvement of TLC. 12–15 samples are routinely separated at the same time on one plate. The method exhibits high sensitivity and reproducibility, and uses low amounts of organic solvents (< 50 mL for one run). Herein, we describe two methods to evidence DGAT activity and specificity using HPTLC.

Method (1) allows the analysis of extracted lipids by derivatization with phosphomolybdic acid reagent. Method (2) is used to study the activity and specificity of a purified DGAT.

Standard solutions

    1. Solutions of cholesteryl oleate, oleic acid methyl ester, trioleine, oleic acid, cholesterol at 2.7 μg/μL each in CHCl3 are prepared.
    2. NBD-DOG (1-{N-[(7-nitro-2-1,3-benzoxadiazol- 4-yl)-methyl] amino-decanoyl-2-decanoyl-sn-glycerol) stock solution in chloroform – methanol 2:1 (V/V) at 67.5 ng/μL (between 5.5 ng to 2.7 μg are applied to generate a calibration curve).

    Sample preparation

      1. Lipids are extracted from yeast biomass according to Folch [2], dried under nitrogen, and resuspended in 200 μL of chloroform – methanol 2:1 (V/V).
      2. DGAT assay to investigate enzyme specificity: NBD-DOG as a fluorescent DAG acceptor and different acyl donors (lauroyl-CoA, palmitoyl-CoA, stearoyl-CoA, oleoyl-CoA, and linoleoyl-CoA. The reaction is carried out at 31°C for one hour under shaking, then stopped by the addition of chloroform – methanol 2:1 (V/V).

      Chromatogram layer

      HPTLC plates silica gel 60 (Merck), pre-washed with isopropanol, are used.

      Sample application

      Between 3.0–6.0 μL for standard solutions and 50.0 μL for sample solutions (corresponding to 400 μg cells, dry weight) are applied as bands with the Automatic TLC Sampler (ATS 3), 15 tracks, band length 5.0 mm, distance from left edge 15.0 mm, distance from lower edge 8.0 mm.

      Chromatography

      Plates are developed in the Automatic Developing Chamber (ADC 2) with chamber saturation (with filter paper) for 20 min, (1) development with diethyl ether – hexane –methanol – acetic acid 60:40:5:1 (V/V) to the migration distance of 80 mm (from the lower edge), drying for 20 min, (2) development with hexane – diethyl ether – acetic acid 80:20:2 (V/V) to the migration distance of 80 mm (from the lower edge), drying for 20 min.

      Post-chromatographic derivatization

      The plates are immersed in 5% phosphomolybdic acid in ethanol, then incubated for 30 min at 100 °C using an oven.

      Documentation

      Images of the plates are captured in white light.

      Densitometry

      Fluorescence measurement is performed with the TLC Scanner 3 (excitation at 473 nm and emission > 510nm). DGAT activity is expressed as picomoles of TAG formed per minute and per milligram of purified protein, using a calibration curve based on the fluorescent signal of NBD-DOG.

      Results and discussion

      The following figure shows the results of the separation of lipids extracted from three yeast strains (method 1). The control yeast strain was transformed with an empty vector; a second strain was transformed with the AtDGAT1 sequence encoding for Arabidopsis thaliana DGAT1, and the last strain was transformed with the EgDGAT1 sequence encoding for Elaeis guineensis DGAT1-1, a putative DGAT [3]. Both cassettes encoding for plant DGAT1 restored TAG accumulation in the Yarrowia lipolytica mutant strain [4]. Thus, we conclude that EgDGAT1 sequence was encoding for an active E. guineensis DGAT1-1.

      Figure 1: HPTLC – a useful tool for the characterization of enzymes from plant lipid metabolism

      Separation of lipids extracted from yeasts strains expressing plant type 1 DGATs (1: standards, 2: empty cassette, 3: AtDGAT1, 4: EgDGAT1-1).

      To generate a calibration curve (method 2), the fluorescence of the NBD-DOG standard applied in different amounts is measured. The standard curve is depicting the dependence of the intensity of the fluorescence of NBD-DOG (minus blank value).

      Figure 2: Calibration curve of NBD-DOG (scanned at 473 nm in fluorescence mode) depicting the dependence of the intensity of the fluorescence of NBD-DOG (top) as function of the amount separated on HPTLC plate (bottom)

      Calibration curve of NBD-DOG (scanned at 473 nm in fluorescence mode) depicting the dependence of the intensity of the fluorescence of NBD-DOG (top) as function of the amount separated on HPTLC plate (bottom)

      In another experiment, purified recombinant DGA1, a type 2 DGAT from the yeast Yarrowia lipolytica was incubated with NBD-DOG and acyl-CoA with various acyl chain lengths (C12:0, C16:0; C18:0).

      Figure 3: Separation of TAG synthetized by purified recombinant yeast type 2 DGAT (DGA1) using acyl-CoA with different chain lengths.

      Separation of TAG synthetized by purified recombinant yeast type 2 DGAT (DGA1) using acyl-CoA with different chain lengths.

      In the absence of an acyl donor, no NBD-TAG was formed (blank track). In the presence of acyl donors (C12:0, C16:0; C18:0–CoA), NBD-TAGs were formed. Noticeably, the migration of the reaction product depended on the length of the acyl chain incorporated. NBD-TAG with C18:0 migrate over a longer distance by comparison to NBD-TAG with C16:0 or C12:0.

      HPTLC is a fast (within two hours), reproducible, and robust method to evidence acyltransferases activities. In vivo (1), complementation of microbial strains affected in neutral lipid metabolism by sequences coding for DGAT led to accumulation of TAGs. The products were extracted, separated by HPTLC and identified directly by comparison with standard molecules. In vitro (2), DGATs transferred various acyls to fluorescent DAG acceptors. Fluorescent products of the reaction (TAGs) were quantified using a substrate calibration curve. The method was sensitive enough to distinguish TAGs differing by only two carbons [5]. Both approaches avoided the use of radioactive labeled products.

      Literature

      [1] Erickson, S.K. and Fielfing, P.E. J Lipid Res 27 (1986) 875–883
      [2] Folch, J. et al. J Biol Chem 226 (1957) 497–509
      [3] Aymé, L., et al. PLoS One (2015) 10: e0143113
      [4] Beopoulos, A., et al. (2012) Appl Microbiol Biotechnol 93: 1523–1537
      [5] Haili N., et al. (2016) J Biol Chem 277: 6478–6482

      Further information on request from the authors.

      Contact: Dr. Laure Aymé and Dr. Thierry Chardot, Institut Jean-Pierre Bourgin, INRAE, AgroParisTech, Université Paris- Saclay, 78000, Versailles, France, laure.ayme[at]recherche.gouv.frthierry.chardot@inrae.fr

      mentioned products

      The following products were used in this case study

      Continue reading

      Use of TLC, HPTLC, and HPTLC-MS during production and purification processes of active ingredients and their impurities

      Didier Rigollet, Amélie Havard and Daniel Dron are working at the R&D department Analytical Innovative Technologies of the Industrial Research Centre at Oril Industrie, in Bolbec, France (Servier group). The use of HPTLC in Oril started even earlier than the foundation of Chromacim, including trainings at CAMAG organised by Pierre Bernard-Savary, where Daniel Dron participated already more than 20 years ago. The R&D team is specialized in purification processes of intermediates and active pharmaceutical ingredients (APIs) for toxicological, galenical or clinical studies. Part of their work is devoted to the isolation of impurities and production of APIs or impurity reference batches. In 2018, the team launched their preparative chromatography service InnoPrepTM, dedicated to small and large-scale purifications. Intermediates, APIs and impurities are characterized by MS and NMR. Quantitative analysis by NMR is also performed on these molecules.

      Introduction

      Servier, an independent international pharmaceutical group, is committed to therapeutic progress for the benefit of patients.

      Their goal is to speed up the development of new molecules in order to bring a new molecular entity to market every 3 years, particularly in the field of oncology. Preparative chromatography is, therefore, a method of choice in R&D to provide pure products for the first pharmacological, toxicological and clinical studies in a very short time. This technique also makes it possible to isolate impurities present at low levels in active ingredients whose complex structure does not allow rapid synthesis and to provide a batch within the time limits set for toxicological studies.

      About 75% of the purifications at Oril Industrie are done with silica gel. The necessary conditions for an efficient purification are determined using TLC. Then, the purification progress by preparative column chromatography is checked by HPTLC. Twenty fractions can be analyzed within one hour. TLC/HPTLC is the method of choice due to its simplicity, rapidness and the successful scale up from TLC to preparative separations. The HPTLC-MS carried out beforehand allows targeting the molecule sought in often very complex mixtures.

      Sample preparation

      Crude product (0.05 g) is dissolved in 5.0 mL of ethyl acetate.

      Chromatogram layer

      For method development (optimization of purification conditions) TLC plates silica gel 60 F254 (Merck), 20 x 5 cm are used, while quantification and coupling to mass spectrometry is done on HPTLC plates silica gel 60 F254 s (Merck), 20 x 10 cm.

      Sample application

      Samples are applied as bands with the Automatic TLC Sampler (ATS 4), two tracks for TLC and up to 20 tracks for HPTLC, band length 8.0 mm, sample volumes of 1.0 –15.0 μL.

      Chromatography

      Plates are developed in the Twin Trough Chamber 20 x 20 cm (TLC) or 20 x 10 cm (HPTLC) with chamber saturation (with filter paper) for 20 min with different developing solvents to the separation distance of 100 mm (from the lower edge) for TLC and 50 mm for HPTLC, followed by drying in a stream of cold air for 5 min.

      Documentation

      Images of the plates are captured with the TLC Visualizer in UV 254 nm and white light.

      Mass spectrometry

      Zones are eluted with the TLC-MS Interface (oval elution head) at a flow rate of 0.2 mL/min with methanol – water 1:1 (V/V) into a Q-TOF-MS (Xevo® G2-S QTof, Waters), operating in positive ionization mode (m/z 50 –1200).

      Results and discussion

      The objective of this study was to isolate a sufficient quantity of an impurity present at a content of 0.35% in a batch of an intermediate in a product under development. The aim was to confirm its structure and to carry out toxicological tests. The nature of this impurity was determined beforehand by LC-MS. Its structure being complex, a synthesis would be too time-consuming. The conditions used in RP-HPLC are too complex for direct transfer to preparative chromatography (expensive stationary phase). The mobile phase used was water + 0.1% methane sulfonic acid and acetonitrile +0.1% methane sulfonic acid is too complexed for the isolation after preparative chromatography.

      Figure 1: RP-LC-UV Chromatogram of the crude product

      RP-LC-UV Chromatogram of the crude product

      TLC was selected for method development to separate the major impurity from the other compounds with a reasonable RF value allowing an efficient purification.

      Figure 2: TLC chromatograms of the crude product in UV 254 nm obtained with different developing solvents

      TLC chromatograms of the crude product in UV 254 nm obtained with different developing solvents

      Mass spectra were recorded to characterize the different compounds (main substance at RF 0.25 and impurity at RF 0.38).

      Figure 3: Instruments used for TLC-MS (left); TLC chromatogram of the main substance and the impurity in white light (middle); mass spectra of the selected zones (a: impurity, b: main substance) measured in positive ionization mode (right)

      Instruments used for TLC-MS (left); TLC chromatogram of the main substance and the impurity in white light (middle); mass spectra of the selected zones (a: impurity, b: main substance) measured in positive ionization mode (right)

      The purification of the crude product (two injections of 90g dissolved in toluene) on a 20-cm column (packed at 40 bars with 6 kg silica gel 60, 15–40 μm, Merck) at a flow rate of 2.0 L/min with toluene – ethyl acetate 95:5 (V/V), was monitored online with UV 290 nm detection and in parallel offline by HPTLC.

      Figure 4: Online monitoring of the purification process by LC-UV (290 nm, left) versus offline by HPTLC-UV (HPTLC chromatogram of the individual fractions at 254 nm, right; C2-C9 are fractions collected during purification and C5 corresponds to the impurity)

      Online monitoring of the purification process by LC-UV (290 nm, left) versus offline by HPTLC-UV (HPTLC chromatogram of the individual fractions at 254 nm, right; C2-C9 are fractions collected during purification and C5 corresponds to the impurity)

      The different fractions of the target impurity were collected, and the combined fractions were analyzed by NMR. 670 mg of impurity was obtained (yield: 0.35%) purity > 99%. The quantity obtained after purification on column was also consistent with the estimated content in analytical HPLC. For Oril, the use of HPTLC has a big positive impact on the production costs, with a benefit of thousands of Euros per year. This is due to the use of HPTLC for various optimizations of the manufacturing process and of raw materials external supply.

      Further information on request from the authors.

      Contact: Amélie Havard, Daniel Dron, Oril Industrie (Servier), Industrial Research Centre, Department of Analytical Innovative Technologies R&D, 13 rue Auguste Desgenétais, CS 60125, 76210 Bolbec, France, amelie.havard@servier.comdaniel.dron@servier.com

      mentioned products

      The following products were used in this case study

      Continue reading

      High-Performance Thin-Layer Chromatography in Practice

      Standardization & SOP for HPTLC

      The great advantage of TLC is its flexibility. Understanding the effects of each parameter on the outcome of the final chromatogram allows adjustments to the methodology in order to obtain the desired result. However, that degree of freedom can become a problem for reproducing a method, especially if not all parameters were documented and adhered to.

      For obtaining predictable and reproducible HPTLC results, it is essential to establish a standardized methodology in the form of a standard operation procedure (SOP).

      The United States Pharmacopoeia (USP-NF 2015) and the European Pharmacopoeia (Ph. Eur. 2017) published general chapters on HPTLC, which are the basis for HPTLC methods of identification as part of monographs on herbal materials. All parameters are based on an SOP adopted by the HPTLC Association in 2012.

      HPTLC parameters compliant with USP and Ph. Eur.

      Plate material:

      • HPTLC glass plates, 20 x 10 cm, Silica gel 60 F254 (2–10 μm, average 5 μm).

      Sample application:

      • 8.0 mm bands, 8.0 mm from lower edge, 20.0 mm from left and right edges. The minimum distance between tracks is 11.4 mm (center to center);
      • Maximum 15 tracks per plate;
      • Track 1 is used for SST;
      • Volumes of less than 2.0 μL and more than 20.0 μL should be avoided. Optimum application volumes are 2.0–10.0 μL.

      Developing chamber and development:

      • Twin Trough chamber (20 x 10 cm);
      • Use 10.0 mL of developing solvent in the front trough (equivalent to a solvent level of 5 mm) and 25.0 mL for saturation in the rear trough fitted with a saturation pad (filter paper of defined thickness);
      • Developing distance 7.0 cm from the lower edge of the plate or 6.2 cm from the application position;
      • Prior to development, condition the plate at a relative humidity of 33% using a saturated solution of magnesium chloride for 10 minutes;
      • With the lid closed, saturate the chamber for 20 minutes (with saturation pad). For development, introduce the plate in a vertical position into the front trough. The silica gel faces the saturation pad;
      • When the developing solvent achieves 7.0 cm, remove the plate from the tank and dry in a vertical position with a stream of cold air for 5 min.

      Derivatization:

      • Automatic spraying or dipping/immersion whenever possible.

      Documentation: record digital images in

      • Short-wave UV light (254 nm), and white light before application as “clean plate image” for image correction;
      • Short-wave UV light (254 nm), long-wave UV light (366 nm), and white light after development;
      • Long-wave UV light (366 nm) and white light after derivatization.

      Converting TLC/HPTLC methods into standardized HPTLC methods

      As the general pharmacopoeial chapters on HPTLC were only recently published, most of the literature methods from before 2015/2017 are not harmonized with those chapters, and thus, may not be considered “standardized HPTLC methods”.

      Nevertheless, all TLC or HPTLC methods can be converted into standardized HPTLC methods. In a preliminary experiment, the standard and sample solutions of the original method are kept as well as developing solvent and derivatization reagent. All other parameters are set to “standard”:

      • Plate material (HPTLC Silica gel 60 F254 20 x 10 cm);
      • Plate layout (15 tracks, 8.0 mm bands, 8.0 mm from lower edge, 20.0 mm from left and right edges);
      • Twin trough chamber, saturated for 20 minutes with saturation pad;
      • Plate activation (plate conditioned at a relative humidity of 33% for 10 minutes);
      • Developing distance (7.0 cm from the lower edge);
      • Drying step after development (5 min with cold air);
      • Derivatization (automatic spraying or dipping/immersion whenever possible);
      • Digital documentation in short-wave UV light (254 nm), longwave UV light (366 nm), and white light before derivatization, long-wave UV light (366 nm), and white light after derivatization.

      Other parameters can be adjusted: usually, application volumes (or concentrations of sample and standard solutions) of TLC methods are reduced to about one-fifth for HPTLC plates. Optimum application volumes for HPTLC are between 2.0 and 10.0 μL.

      The preparation and use of derivatization reagents should follow the pharmacopoeias or the General SOP of the HPTLC Association. Special derivatization reagents may be evaluated.

      Sample preparation may be optimized if needed and simplified if possible. Cumbersome methods and harmful solvents should be avoided. A system suitability test (SST) (e.g. based on the Universal HPTLC Mix [1]) must be introduced.

      Comprehensive HPTLC fingerprinting

      HPTLC is a standard technique for chemical identification of herbal drugs adopted by many pharmacopoeias. Resulting HPTLC fingerprints are usually visually evaluated. When generated with a standardized methodology, using suitable instruments and software, digital HPTLC fingerprints offer the necessary reproducibility for deeper exploitation of the data and for quantitative evaluation.

      HPTLC fingerprint

      The HPTLC fingerprint is the digital image of the visual HPTLC chromatogram. It represents the identity of a sample and consists of a sequence of separated zones with a certain color and intensity, and may be a stack of multiple images from different detection modes. The HPTLC fingerprint also includes any zones at the application and front positions, which are usually not detected in other chromatographic techniques.

      Additionally, the HPTLC fingerprint is part of the digital image of the entire HPTLC plate. That HPTLC plate contains information regarding other samples and standards, the quality of the chromatography (assessed with an SST), and the chromatographic conditions during all steps. All information can be stored in an analysis file. All fingerprints from a plate that has passed the SST can be compared to fingerprints from other plates developed with the same method, which have also passed the SST.

      Peak Profile from Image (PPI)

      Unlike scanning densitometry, which measures the absorbance or fluorescence of a zone using a single wavelength per scan, image analysis evaluates the pixels of the three channels red (R), green (G), and blue (B). For each track, the RGB values of the pixel lines (RF position) of 50% of the length of the zones can be averaged and used to calculate the luminance L with the equation L = (1/3 R) + (1/3 G) + (1/3 B). Plotting the luminance as function of RF generates the Peak Profile from Image. Information on peak height and area contained in PPI data can be used for quantitative assessments.

      Figure 1: Transformation of the digital image of the HPTLC chromatogram into the corresponding peak profile from image (PPI). Adapted from [2]

      Figure 1: Transformation of the digital image of the HPTLC chromatogram into the corresponding peak profile from image (PPI). Adapted from [2]

      The concept of “comprehensive HPTLC fingerprinting”

      Conversion of images into peak profiles results in a loss of color information. Because the PPI formula weights the channels equally, the relative intensity of the zones observed in the image may differ from those of the PPI. Therefore, a comprehensive evaluation of a fingerprint includes the analysis of the PPI and the corresponding image. This is taken into account in the concept of “comprehensive HPTLC fingerprinting”.

      In comprehensive HPTLC fingerprinting, tests for identity, purity, and content of an herbal drug, preparation, or product are performed in a single analysis. Qualitative and quantitative information from the HPTLC fingerprints (images in different detection modes) and PPI are combined.

      Peak profiles from scanning densitometry (PPSD) can offer complementary, spectrally selective information but do not belong to the core data of comprehensive HPTLC fingerprinting.

      Figure 2: The combination of HPTLC images and peak profiles from images allows testing for identity, purity, and content in a single analysis.

      Figure 2: The combination of HPTLC images and peak profiles from images allows testing for identity, purity, and content in a single analysis.

      Example: comprehensive HPTLC fingerprinting of Angelica gigas root

      The concept of comprehensive HPTLC fingerprinting was developed for the quality control of the herbal drug Angelica gigas root, and can be expanded to other fields of analysis.

      Criteria for the identification of A. gigas root were established based on the evaluation of multiple samples of cultivated material. An average fingerprint (pooled sample) was then generated. That fingerprint represents the typical characteristics of the herbal drug and is used as reference. The selected method is also able to distinguish A. gigas root from the roots of 27 related plant species.

      Two potential confounding herbal drugs of A. gigas root, the roots of Angelica acutiloba and Angelica sinensis, which carry the same common name “Dang gui”, were investigated in a test for purity. The presence of either confounding material in a mixture is detectable at levels as low as 1%, based on the detection of z-ligustilide. This zone, characteristic of the two and nine other related herbal drugs, is absent in A. gigas root.

      • Figure 3: Identification – evaluation of multiple samples of Angelica gigas root samples, and average, representative fingerprint (track A) in short-wave UV light 254 nm (upper) and in long-wave UV light 366 nm (bottom). Adapted from [2]

        Figure 3: Identification – evaluation of multiple samples of Angelica gigas root samples, and average, representative fingerprint (track A) in short-wave UV light 254 nm (upper) and in long-wave UV light 366 nm (bottom). Adapted from [2]

      • Figure 4: Purity – detection of z-ligustilide (characteristic of the confounding species) in A. gigas root. Image and PPI evaluations. Red bars: peak height of z-ligustilide in mixtures of A. acutiloba and A. gigas root. Blue bars: peak height of z-ligustilide in mixtures of A. sinensis and A. gigas root. Adapted from [2]

        Figure 4: Purity – detection of z-ligustilide (characteristic of the confounding species) in A. gigas root. Image and PPI evaluations. Red bars: peak height of z-ligustilide in mixtures of A. acutiloba and A. gigas root. Blue bars: peak height of z-ligustilide in mixtures of A. sinensis and A. gigas root. Adapted from [2]

      • Figure 5: Test MC against a reference standard equivalent to the MC. Image and PPI evaluations, and % content of D/DA, of 24 samples of A. gigas root. Adapted from [2]

        Figure 5: Test MC against a reference standard equivalent to the MC. Image and PPI evaluations, and % content of D/DA, of 24 samples of A. gigas root. Adapted from [2]

      Literature

      [1] T. K. T. Do et al. (2021) Journal of Chromatography A, 1638. DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2020.461830

      [2] S. Cañigueral et al. Chapter 7: High performance thin-layer chromatography (HPTLC) in the quality control of herbal products. pp 119 – 136. In: Recent Advances in Pharmaceutical Sciences VIII. 2018.

      mentioned products

      The following products were used in this case study

      Continue reading

      Parameters of High-Performance Thin-Layer Chromatography (Part 2)

      Documentation

      In contrast to other chromatographic techniques, HPTLC offers the unique advantage to visualize the chromatographic result directly for the human eye, allowing a convenient qualitative evaluation of multiple samples on the same plate. Substances with absorption at 254 nm can be visualized on plates with fluorescence indicator F254 by exposure to short-wave UV light (254 nm). The fluorescence of some substances can be excited by long-wave UV light (366 nm). Substances with or without chromophore can be derivatized for improved detectability.

      • Figure 1a: Image of chromatogram in white light

        Figure 1a: Image of chromatogram in white light

      • Figure 1b: Image of chromatogram in short-wave UV light (254 nm)

        Figure 1b: Image of chromatogram in short-wave UV light (254 nm)

      • Figure 1c: Image of chromatogram in long-wave UV light (366 nm)

        Figure 1c: Image of chromatogram in long-wave UV light (366 nm)

      With a suitable device (e.g. imaging and documentation system, UV cabinet and digital camera), electronic images of the chromatogram can be captured in different illumination modes. In white light illumination, the light reflected from the layer background is captured. In long-wavelength UV light (366 nm), substances with inherent or reagent induced fluorescence appear as bright spots, often differently colored, on a dark background. When short-wavelength UV light (254 nm) is used, substances absorbing UV 254 appear as dark zones on a bright green or pale blue background, provided the layer contains a fluorescence indicator F254 or F254s (fluorescence quenching).

      Using dedicated HPTLC software, these images can be captured, annotated, and archived in compliance with cGxP, and evaluated against the descriptions provided e.g. by pharmacopoeias or other standards. Furthermore, profiles generated from the captured images build the basis for “Comprehensive HPTLC Fingerprinting”.

      Instrumentation

      CAMAG® TLC Visualizer 2

      The visual presentation of the complete chromatogram showing all samples and standards side by side is one of the most convincing arguments for HPTLC. The TLC Visualizer 2 is a professional imaging and documentation system for HPTLC chromatograms, ensuring highest reproducibility in obtaining high-quality images acquired under homogeneous illumination conditions in UV 254 nm, UV 366 nm, and white light in transmission, reflection, and reflection plus transmission mode.

      The image enhancement tools featured in the visionCATS software exploit the full potential of the high-end device. Images are automatically captured based on an optimized control of the illumination and parameters specified in the HPTLC method. Sophisticated algorithms guarantee the highest image quality for identification of even the weakest zones. With the Comparison Viewer, tracks originating from the same or different plates and/or different illumination modes can be compared on the same screen side by side, which allows the creation of virtual plates.

      Additionally, the visionCATS software enables an image-based evaluation of chromatograms obtained with the TLC Visualizer 2.

      Figure 2: CAMAG® TLC Visualizer 2

      Figure 2: CAMAG® TLC Visualizer 2

      CAMAG® UV Cabinet 4

      The CAMAG® UV Cabinet 4 consists of the UV Lamp 4 and the Viewing Box 4 and is designed for visual inspection of chromatograms in UV light 254 nm and UV light 366 nm in a bright environment. The interior is accessible via a roller shutter on the front effectively minimizing the influence of ambient light. A glass filter in the viewing window protects the eyes against UV light reflected during visual inspection through the observation port.

      Figure 3: CAMAG® UV Cabinet 4

      Figure 3: CAMAG® UV Cabinet 4

      CAMAG® BioLuminizer® 2

      The BioLuminizer® 2 is a detection system specifically designed to detect bioluminescence on HPTLC plates. The system consists of a compartment excluding any extraneous light, climate controlled for extended stability of the plate, and a 16 bit CCD digital camera of high-resolution and high-quantum efficiency. Hyphenating HPTLC and bioassay is an excellent tool for identification of single toxic compounds in complex sample matrices. The method is suitable for the detection of toxins in foodstuff, beverages, cosmetics, wastewater, drinking water, and for the detection of bioactivity in natural products. After chromatographic separation of the complex sample, the plate is immersed in a suspension of bioluminescent bacteria Allivibrio fischeri. The reaction takes place within a very short time. All zones with inhibitory or toxic effects appear as dark zones on the luminescent plate background. This stand-alone detection system is operated with BioLuminizer® 2 software.

      Figure 4: CAMAG® BioLuminizer® 2

      Figure 4: CAMAG® BioLuminizer® 2

      Derivatization

      The possibility of convenient chemical derivatization of substances separated on the plate is a strong advantage of planar chromatographic techniques. There are specific and non-specific reagents. An extensive list of reagents and their targeted groups can be found in the two-volume collection “Thin-Layer Chromatography: Reagents and Detection Methods” [1] [2]. It is possible, in some cases, to use subsequently a specific reagent and a universal reagent on the same plate. For example, the first derivatization with natural products reagent (2-aminoethyl diphenylborinate), specific for phenolic compounds like flavonoids, can be followed with anisaldehyde reagent, which is rather universal.

      Reagent Transfer onto the Plate

      Most derivatization reagents are solutions that are sprayed onto the developed plate or into which the plate is dipped. In a few cases, the reagent is a gas that can be generated, e.g. in the rear trough of a TTC (ammonia or HCl from the respective aqueous solution, iodine from iodine crystals), while the plate is in the empty front trough of the chamber.

      • Automated spraying: It takes advantage of dedicated instruments, which control the transferred volume of reagent and minimize the release of fumes. About 2-3 mL of reagent are typically used for a standard HPTLC plate. A wide range of reagents is compatible with this technique.

      • Manual spraying: Is a quick, inexpensive and universally applicable method of reagent transfer, performed with a simple glass apparatus and a hand-held rubber ball pump or compressed air. The principal drawbacks are the considerable skills required to achieve homogenous and reproducible results and the generation of toxic fumes.

      • Automated dipping/immersion: Utilizes an immersion device to achieve a very homogenous and reproducible reagent transfer. Rather large volumes of reagent (up to 200 mL), which can be re-used a couple of times, are provided in a dipping tank. The stability of reagents and possible contamination during possible re-use must be considered as well as changes in the concentration.

      The preparation of reagents for dipping and spraying may be different. Dipping may require reduced reagent concentration and solvent adaptation to avoid washing off the separated samples during immersion.

      Completion of the Derivatization

      The majority of the chemical reactions require heating of the plate in an oven or on a hot plate (plate heater). For reproducible results, the temperature and duration of heating must be controlled. Proper timing is required for documentation of the result of the derivatization because colors obtained in the process may change or fade with time and temperature.

      • Figure 5a: Image of chromatogram in white light after derivatization

        Figure 5a: Image of chromatogram in white light after derivatization

      • Figure 5b: Image of chromatogram in long-wave UV light 366 nm after derivatization

        Figure 5b: Image of chromatogram in long-wave UV light 366 nm after derivatization

      Instrumentation

      CAMAG® HPTLC PRO Module DERIVATIZATION

      The degree of automation and productivity are key factors for the HPTLC laboratory. The Module DERIVATIZATION is part of the HPTLC PRO SYSTEM, a fully automated sample analysis and evaluation system using HPTLC plates (20 x 10 cm), which is best suited for routine quality control of analytes, extracted from complex matrices and provides reproducible and reliable results.

      Designed for the fully automatic derivatization of HPTLC glass plates (20 x 10 cm), the Module DERIVATIZATION combines two steps in a single device: high-precision spraying of derivatization reagents and heating of the plate. Employing the patented micro-droplet spraying technology, the Module DERIVATIZATION enables maximum homogeneity in applying derivatization reagents. The integrated plate heating unit ensures a uniform heat distribution across the plate.

      To suit the viscosity of the spraying reagents, three different nozzles are available. Equipped with a fully automated nozzle changer and cleaning station, the Module DERIVATIZATION effectively avoids cross-contamination.

      Figure 6: CAMAG® HPTLC PRO Module DERIVATIZATION

      Figure 6: CAMAG® HPTLC PRO Module DERIVATIZATION

      CAMAG® Derivatizer

      Designed for automated reagent transfer onto HPTLC plates, the Derivatizer ensures highest reproducibility and safe handling. Employing the patented micro-droplet spraying technology, the Derivatizer guarantees unsurpassed homogeneous reagent distribution at low consumption. The stand-alone device enables reproducible and user-independent results and is suitable for a wide range of spraying reagents.

      Figure 7: CAMAG® Derivatizer

      Figure 7: CAMAG® Derivatizer

      CAMAG® TLC Plate Heater 3

      The TLC Plate Heater 3 is a device for heating HPTLC plates, permitting the optimal heating during the derivatization reaction. It features a NEXTREMA® heating surface, which is resistant to all common reagents and is easily cleaned. The heating surface has a grid to facilitate correct positioning of the plate. The temperature is selectable between 25 and 200 °C, the programmed and the actual temperature are displayed.

      Figure 8: CAMAG® TLC Plate Heater 3

      Figure 8: CAMAG® TLC Plate Heater 3

      Densitometry

      HPTLC chromatograms can be recorded with scanning densitometry showing peaks of the separated compounds. In a densitometer, a vertical beam of monochromatic light between 190-900 nm moves along the individual tracks of the plate. Part of that light is reflected from the plate and measured by a detector. The obtained signal is processed and plotted as a function of position (RF), generating the densitogram or Peak Profile from Scanning Densitometry (PPSD) used for qualitative and quantitative evaluation.

      Figure 9: Densitograms measured at different wavelengths

      Figure 9: Densitograms measured at different wavelengths



      Modern scanning densitometers allow measurements in two modes:

      Absorbance mode: Measures the amount of light absorbed by the zones. The particles of the stationary phase reflect light (baseline). Zones present in the track can absorb part of that light lowering the signal received in the detector. For plotting the PPSD, the signal is typically inverted.

      Figure 10: Simplified scheme of absorbance mode

      Figure 10: Simplified scheme of absorbance mode


      Fluorescence mode: Measures the fluorescence of the zones excited at a specific wavelength. From a molecular point of view, fluorescence happens when a photon is absorbed, causing an electronic transition from the ground state to an excited state. When the molecule returns to its ground state, the energy is dissipated at a higher wavelength. To selectively detect the response, densitometers are usually equipped with a cut-off filter placed between the plate and the detector (yellow rectangle in the Figure 11). The cut-off filter blocks the reflected short wave light used for excitation so that only longer wavelengths can reach the detector (photomultiplier). 

      Figure 11: Simplified scheme of fluorescence mode

      Figure 11: Simplified scheme of fluorescence mode

      Fluorescence measurements are up to 100 times more sensitive than absorbance measurements and generally feature a straight baseline because the cut-off filter blocks reflected light from the plate. Only a few substances are naturally fluorescent. Fluorescence can be induced by chemical derivatization, however the fluorescence of zones is not always stable and might decrease over time. Commercial densitometers feature three light sources:

      • Deuterium lamp
      • Tungsten lamp
      • Mercury lamp
      Figure 12: Emission spectra of commonly used light sources

      Figure 12: Emission spectra of commonly used light sources

      Instrumentation

      CAMAG® TLC Scanner 4

      Designed for the densitometric evaluation of HPTLC chromatograms, the TLC Scanner 4 measures the reflection of separated compounds in absorption and/or fluorescence mode. The spectral range of light from 190 to 900 nm is available for selecting single or multiple wavelengths. Detection can thus be fine-tuned to match the spectral properties of the analyte to its optimized specificity and sensitivity of the detection. The visionCATS software controls the TLC Scanner 4 and enables quantitative evaluation of the generated densitometric data. To determine the substance concentration in a sample, five different quantification functions are available. Several scanning steps, e.g. scanning the plate after development and scanning the same plate after derivatization and up to five different evaluations can be performed with data obtained from single wavelength, multiple wavelengths or a combination of measurements in absorption and fluorescence detection mode.

      Figure 13: CAMAG® TLC Scanner 4

      Figure 13: CAMAG® TLC Scanner 4

      Literature

      [1] Thin-Layer Chromatography: Reagents and Detection Methods, Physical and Chemical Detection Methods: Fundamentals, Reagents I; Vol. 1a, H. Jork et al., VCH, 1990

      [2] Thin-Layer Chromatography: Reagents and Detection Methods. Physical and Chemical Detection Methods: Activation Reactions, Reagent sequences, Reagents II. Vol. 1b; H. Jork et al., VCH, 1994

      mentioned products

      The following products were used in this case study

      Continue reading

      Quantitative determination of steviol glycosides

      This case study demonstrates a rapid characterization of Stevia formulations by a selective derivatization of steviol glycosides and additionally, it shows the concept of confirming identity of the different steviol glycosides by coupling with mass spectrometry.

      Introduction

      HPTLC is a powerful technique with regard to high sample throughput capacity, short analysis time, and low running costs. Our case study demonstrates a rapid characterization of Stevia formulations by a selective derivatization of steviol glycosides and additionally, it shows the concept of confirming identity of the different steviol glycosides by coupling with mass spectrometry.

      Challenge

      Often chromatographic techniques require a time and cost intensive sample preparation step. In many cases HPTLC allows the analysis of samples after a minimal sample preparation (e.g. dissolving) in combination with the separation of several samples side by side. Quantification of the separated compounds is possible by densitometry using CAMAG’s TLC Scanner. In addition, the identity can be proven by eluting the spot of interest using CAMAG’s TLC-MS Interface and coupling it to any mass spectrometer.

      Description of the procedure and documentation

      Sample and standard preparation are performed according to Morlock et al. (Journal of Chromatography A, 1350 (2014) 102-111 and CBS 109, p.10-12). All parameters (conditions for sample application, chromatogram development, and evaluation) are logged into the visionCATS software, which controls all major CAMAG instruments needed for the HPTLC analysis. The samples and standards are applied band-wise on the HPTLC plate using the ATS 4, which guarantees precise and reliable application. Then the HPTLC plate is developed using the ADC 2. For the analysis of steviol glycosides the developed plate is dipped into β-naphtol reagent, heated at 122°C for 5 minutes, and documented by the TLC Visualizer under white light and UV 366 nm. For quantification each track is scanned in absorption mode at 500 nm with the TLC Scanner and evaluated with visionCATS software. If further investigations of separated sample components are of interest, their eluted zones can be analyzed with other techniques like MS, NIR, and NMR (off-line hyphenation).


      • Images of the results: densitogramm, calibration curve and image comparison of Stevia formulation samples, standards and leaves after derivatization; HPTLC-MS full scan mass spectrum of Rebaudioside A.

        01

        Images of the results: densitogramm, calibration curve and image comparison of Stevia formulation samples, standards and leaves after derivatization

      • HPTLC-MS full scan mass spectrum of Rebaudioside A zone showing most pronounced signals at m/z 989.6 [M+Na]+

        02

        HPTLC-MS full scan mass spectrum of Rebaudioside A zone showing most pronounced signals at m/z 989.6 [M+Na]+

      Benefits of using modern HPTLC for the analysis of food samples

        • HPTLC visualizes at the first glance the similarities and differences between samples and references.
        • By using internal or external chemical reference standards compounds can be quantified precisely with the TLC Scanner.
        • HPTLC is also used for assays (potency), determination of purity (adulteration/fraud), and stability studies (shelf life).
        • The entire sample is detectable on the plate and allows evaluation of all components even if some of them remain at the application zone or in the solvent front.
        • HPTLC can analyze samples with high matrix content because of the disposable stationary phase.
        • HPTLC can be used as high throughput and low-cost technique for the analysis of food samples.
        • Due to the non-destructive nature of the chromatographic method, analytes can be eluted after separation from the plates using CAMAG’s TLC-MS Interface and analyzed by hyphenated techniques (e.g. MS, NIR, NMR).

        mentioned products

        The following products were used in this case study

        Continue reading

        Quantification of methylglyoxal in Manuka honey – A simple HPTLC based approach

        Honey is one of the most frequently tested natural food products. In recent years, Manuka honey has gained popularity because of its high antibacterial activity [1]. Methylglyoxal (MGO) was identified as one of the major contributors to its antibacterial property. MGO is present in high concentrations in manuka honey and is directly responsible for its potency. This makes the Manuka honey exclusive and high-priced as compared to the other traditional kinds of honey. Manuka honey from New Zealand usually contains 40 to 800 mg/kg of MGO but can even contain up to 1900 mg/kg [2]. To avoid adulteration of Manuka honey products, a strict quality regulation regarding its origin, purity, and quality needs to be fulfilled and is a prerequisite for the UMF™ (Unique Manuka Factor) grading [2]. It mostly reflects the MGO amount in the honey but also considers other authenticity markers.

        In the following application, we focus on the MGO quantification using HPTLC with subsequent substance confirmation by MS measurement. The high viscosity and high sugar content of honey make it a very complex and matrix-rich sample to analyze. HPTLC is a convenient, fast, and efficient separation technique that enables the development of analytical methods without the need for complicated sample preparations or high investments [3]. Low cost and short analysis time per sample are given by the parallel analysis of many samples on one plate. Furthermore, the high matrix tolerance of HPTLC offers additional opportunities to existing routine methods.

        Six different commercially available Manuka honey samples were analyzed. MGO shows a mesomeric effect and reacts immediately with water to form either methylglyoxal monohydrate or methylglyoxal dihydrate [4]. Only a small amount of around 1% MGO remains unreacted. Direct detection of MGO in Manuka honey is difficult with conventional methods. In this application, MGO is converted to the stable 2-methylquinoxaline by derivatization with 1,2-phenylenediamine [5]. The stable form is then used as the reference. For confirmation of the method and determination of the recovery rate, regular honey samples were spiked with MGO and 1,2-phenylenediamine. Other derivatization options were tested but the reaction with 1,2-phenylenediamine performed best. Water and honey matrix were tested, to confirm that the optimized reaction conditions provide reproducible results for both matrices.

        Standard solutions

        The standards are prepared by dissolving 100 μL of Sigma-Aldrich ~40% aqueous MGO solution (exact content known from batch specification) in 20.0 mL of water. 800 μL of the stock solution is further diluted with water to 10.0 mL and 0.2% (2 mg/mL) of the reactant Supelco 1,2-phenylenediamine powder is added. All standard solutions are stored at 8°C for two days before use to achieve reproducible reaction of MGO with 1,2-phenylendiamine. Longer storage time (>3 days) leads to partial degradation of 2-methylquinoxaline.

        Sample preparation

        Honey samples are prepared at 100–150 mg/mL (in the shown examples: honey sample solutions of 100 mg/mL in case of sample numbers 1, 3, 5, and 150 mg/mL in case of honey samples 2, 4 and 6 were applied in a higher volume due to the expected lower amount of MGO). To each sample 0.2% of 1,2-phenylenediamine is added, e.g., sample 1, 4.0 g honey diluted in 40 mL solution of water /ethanol in 3:2. To the solution, 0.2% (2 mg/mL) of the reactant 1,2-phenylenediamine is added. Before using the samples, they need to be stored at 8°C for two days to complete the reaction.

        Chromatogram layer

        Supelco HPTLC silica gel 60 F254 20 x 10 cm are used. The plates are pre-washed with the developing solvent (up to 70 mm) and dried before use.

        Sample application

        Between 0.3–9.0 μL of the samples and standard solutions are applied as areas 5 x 3 mm [2] with the ATS 4 (y = 10 mm, x = 15 mm). This step is necessary because of the high matrix and high application volumes of the honey samples.

        Chromatography

        After drying, the plate is developed in a Twin Trough Chamber (20 x 10 cm, both troughs filled, 15 minutes waiting time before use, without filter paper) with ethyl acetate – acetonitrile 85:15 (V/V) to the migration distance of 50 mm (from the lower edge), followed by drying for 5 min at 60°C with a plate heater.

        Post-chromatographic derivatization

        After development, the plate is dried and then derivatized by dipping in an anisaldehyde-sulfuric acid reagent (0.5 mL p-anisaldehyde, 85 mL methanol, 10 mL glacial acetic acid, 5 mL sulfuric acid 98%). Blue zones of 2-methylquinoxaline (product of the reaction ofMGOwith 1,2-phenylenediamine) appear at RF 0.8. The yellow zone at RF 0.7 is unreacted 1,2-phenylendiamine.

        Documentation

        Images of the plate are captured with the TLC Visualizer in white light.

        Densitometry

        Absorbance measurement at 480 nm is performed with CAMAG TLC Scanner 3 (slit dimension: 2.00 x 0.20 mm, scanning speed: 20 mm/s, data resolution: 100 μm/step).

        Mass spectrometry

        The target zones are marked in UV light 254 nm. Afterwards, they are directly eluted from the plate with acetonitrile – water – formic acid 95:5:0.1 (V/V) and an MS-Interface, and measured with a single quadrupole MS.

        Results and discussion

        As demonstrated, MGO can be identified and quantified in different honey samples within the concentration range of 50 to 600 mg/kg. The conversion of MGO into the more stable compound 2-methylquinoxaline allows for an easy evaluation of theMGO content. A recovery study was performed using regular honey to simulate the honey matrix. It was spiked with a known amount of MGO standard solution, followed by the addition of 1,2-phenylenediamine. The measured (and calculated) MGO amount allowed for the correlation of the actual amount of MGO in the Manuka honey samples. The recovery study showed a detectable MGO amount of around 90%. The correlated MGO amount in Manuka samples was calculated accordingly. One of the samples (sample 1) showed a lower MGO content than indicated by the supplier. This might be because of the degradation of the MGO during storage. Samples 2 and 6 only showed MGO concentrations of 50 and 100 mg/kg. These Manuka honey samples are considered of lower quality; although no MGO concentration was provided by the supplier.

        In summary, the analysis of MGO in a complex and challenging food matrix like honey was described. The target analyte could be easily separated and detected without time-consuming and laborintensive sample preparation. The flexible set-up enabled a combination with MS measurements. Screening and method development capabilities were shown by the application of 27 tracks on one plate. The study clearly differentiated various honey qualities (referring toMGO content) on the market. Though the analysis of MGO is challenging, MGO content could be well quantified in the expected range. A fast, cheap, and simple quantification of MGO can be accomplished with HPTLC.


        • As demonstrated, MGO can be identified and quantified in different honey samples within the concentration range of 50 to 600 mg/kg. The conversion of MGO into the more stable compound 2-methylquinoxaline allows for an easy evaluation of theMGO content. A recovery study was performed using regular honey to simulate the honey matrix. It was spiked with a known amount of MGO standard solution, followed by the addition of 1,2-phenylenediamine. The measured (and calculated) MGO amount allowed for the correlation of the actual amount of MGO in the Manuka honey samples. The recovery study showed a detectable MGO amount of around 90%. The correlated MGO amount in Manuka samples was calculated accordingly. One of the samples (sample 1) showed a lower MGO content than indicated by the supplier. This might be because of the degradation of the MGO during storage. Samples 2 and 6 only showed MGO concentrations of 50 and 100 mg/kg. These Manuka honey samples are considered of lower quality; although no MGO concentration was provided by the supplier.

In summary, the analysis of MGO in a complex and challenging food matrix like honey was described. The target analyte could be easily separated and detected without time-consuming and laborintensive sample preparation. The flexible set-up enabled a combination with MS measurements. Screening and method development capabilities were shown by the application of 27 tracks on one plate. The study clearly differentiated various honey qualities (referring toMGO content) on the market. Though the analysis of MGO is challenging, MGO content could be well quantified in the expected range. A fast, cheap, and simple quantification of MGO can be accomplished with HPTLC.

          01

          Mass spectra of 2-methylquinoxaline (m/z = 145.0 [M+H+] and 186.0 [M+ACN+H+]) and 1,2-phenylendiamin (m/z = 150.0 [M+ACN+H+])

        • Reaction mechanism of MGO and 1,2-phenylenediamine

          02

          Reaction mechanism of MGO and 1,2-phenylenediamine

        • HPTLC chromatograms in white light after derivatization with anisaldehyde (left) and the corresponding densitogram (right) measured at 480 nm (zones at RF 0.80)

          03

          HPTLC chromatograms in white light after derivatization with anisaldehyde (left) and the corresponding densitogram (right) measured at 480 nm (zones at RF 0.80)

        • Calibration curve for quantification of MGO in Manuka honey samples

          04

          Calibration curve for quantification of MGO in Manuka honey samples

        Literature

        [1] E. Mavric, et al. (2008) Mol Nutr Food Res
        [2] https://newzealandhoneyco.com/pages/mgo-vs-umfcalculator- manuka-honey
        [3] M. Schulz et al. (2009) Analytix Reporter, Issue 5
        [4] https://magritek.com/2021/01/29/identification-andquantification- of-methylglyoxal-in-manuka-honey/
        [5] E. Dimitrova (2013), Master thesis, TU University of Graz, Austria
        [6] Merck (unpublished results)

        Further information on request from the authors.

        Contact: Dr. Monika Bäumle, Global Product Manager TLC, Merck, monika.baeumle[at]merckgroup.com.

        The life science business of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany operates as MilliporeSigma in the U.S. and Canada.

        mentioned products

        The following products were used in this case study

        Continue reading

        Identification and quantification of glucose degradation products

        The subject of this article was investigated by Prof. Dr. Martin Brandl, Anette Engels, Dr. Matthias Vogel, Dr. Thomas Zapf and Sarah Leitzen [1]. Prof. Dr. Martin Brandl is a pharmacist and professor at the Department of Physics, Chemistry and Pharmacy at the University of Southern Denmark (SDU), Odense, Denmark and supervisor of Sarah Leitzen’s doctoral thesis. Anette Engels, Dr. Matthias Vogel and Dr. Thomas Zapf work at the Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices (BfArM) in Bonn. Sarah Leitzen is a pharmacist and PhD student working at both BfArM and SDU.

        Introduction

        Sterile glucose solutions are commonly used as reconstitution solvents or diluents for injectable drugs and also for peritoneal dialysis solutions. In Germany, regulatory requirements for the different strengths of glucose solutions used for parenteral administration are regulated and published as standard marketing authorizations. During heat sterilization of glucose solutions for parenteral use, a variety of glucose degradation products (GDPs) may be formed. GDPs can cause cytotoxic effects after parenteral administration of these solutions. Therefore, the aim of the current study was to develop a simple and quick HPTLC method by which the major GDPs can be identified and (summarily) quantified in glucose solutions for parenteral administration. All GDPs were derivatized with o-phenylenediamine (OPD). The identity of the resulting GDP derivatives (quinoxalines) during method validation was confirmed via mass spectrometry

        Standard solutions and pre-chromatographic derivatization

        For each degradation product (glyoxal (GO), methylglyoxal (MGO) , glucosone (2-KDG) , 3-deoxyglucosone (3-DG), 3-deoxygalactosone (3-DGal), 3,4-dideoxyglucosone-3-ene (3,4-DGE), and the impurity 5-hydroxymethylfurfural (5- HMF)), individual 0.5 mg/mL solutions are prepared with fresh ultrapure water, as well as a mix of all seven GDPs. For quantification, calibration standards containing all seven GDPs at concentration levels of 1–75 μg/mL are prepared. All solutions also contain 50 mg/mL glucose and 0.75 mg/mL OPD. They are left to stand in the dark for 16 hours at room temperature.

        Sample preparation and pre-chromatographic derivatization

        An artificial mix is prepared to simulate expected concentrations of GDPs in an autoclaved 5% glucose solution containing GO and MGO (1.0 mg/mL, each), 2-KDG (7.0 mg/mL), 3-DG (45.0 mg/mL), 3-DGal (25.0 mg/mL), 3,4-DGE and 5-HMF (5.0 mg/mL, each). The mix also contains glucose in a concentration of 50 mg/mL and OPD as derivatization reagent in a concentration of 0.75 mg/mL. Samples are analyzed after a 16 h reaction time at room temperature.

        Chromatogram layer

        HPTLC glass plates silica gel 60 F254 (Merck), 20 x 20 cm are used.

        Sample application

        Samples and standard solutions are applied as bands with the Automatic TLC Sampler (ATS 4), band length 10.0 mm, distance between tracks of 19.0 mm, distance from lower edge 29.0 mm. 10 μL for sample and standard solutions are applied.

        Chromatography

        Plates are developed in the Twin Trough Chamber (TTC 20 x 20 cm) with chamber saturation (with filter paper) for 20 min, development with 25 mL of 1,4-dioxane – toluene – glacial acetic acid 49:49:2 (V/V) (each trough) to the migration distance of 160 mm (from the lower edge), followed by drying for 10 min.

        Editor’s Note: in this special case, a migration distance of 160 mm leads to a significantly improved separation on HPTLC with the selected solvent system. Usually, a migration exceeding 80 mm on HPTLC plates does not improve resolution due to increasing diffusion

        Post-chromatographic derivatization (second derivatization)

        The plates are sprayed with the Derivatizer (yellow nozzle, level 4, 2 mL) with thymolsulfuric acid reagent (2 mL of a solution of 0.5 g of thymol in a mixture of 5 mL of sulfuric acid and 95 mL of ethanol 96%) and heated at 130˚C for 10 minutes on the TLC Plate Heater.

        Authors’ Note: While establishing the method, two identical plates were run simultaneously (in separate twin trough chambers with chamber saturation), where one of the two plates was not treated with thymol-sulfuric acid reagent for substance confirmation by mass spectrometry.

        Documentation

        Images of the plate are captured with the TLC Visualizer in UV 254 nm, UV 366 nm, and white light.

        Densitometry

        The HPTLC plate was scanned in absorbance mode at 330, 370, and 420 nm, and in fluorescencemode at 366>/400 nm.

        Mass spectrometry

        One of the duplicate plates (plate without 2nd derivatization step) is used for substance confirmation. The zones are localized with the help of the plate derivatized with thymol-sulfuric acid reagent. Zones of interest are scraped off at the expected position and extracted three times, using 200 μL of methanol each time, and centrifuged for 2 min at 16,000 rpm/21,130 rcf. The supernatants are evaporated with nitrogen and the residues are finally reconstituted in 200 μL of a 5 mM ammonium acetate buffer solution (pH = 3.5). The solutions are analyzed in positive electrospray ionization mode [1].

        Editor’s Note: The zones can also directly be eluted to an MS for substance confirmation with the TLC-MS Interface 2. However, this equipment was not available at the BfArM.

        Results and discussion

        Glucose, as a highly polar molecule, does not react with OPD, or only to a lesser degree, and maintains its hydrophilic character without forming the quinoxaline system. Therefore, glucose is observed at the application position.

        The presented method was successfully validated using the ICH Q2(R1) guideline. For 2-KDG, the linearity of the method was demonstrated in the range of 1–50 μg/mL, for 5-HMF and 3,4-DGE 1–75 μg/mL, for GO/MGO 2–150 μg/mL, and for 3- DG/3-DGal 10–150 μg/mL. All GDPs achieved a limit of detection (LOD) of 2 μg/mL or less and a limit of quantification (LOQ) of 10 μg/mL or less. R2 was 0.982 for 3.4-DGE, 0.997 for 5-HMF, and 0.999 for 2-KDG, 3-DG/3-DGal, and GO/MGO. The intraday precision was between 0.4 and 14.2% and the accuracy, reported as%recovery, between 86.4 and 112.7%. The proposed HPTLC method appears to be an inexpensive, fast, and sufficiently sensitive approach for routine quantitative analysis of GDPs in heat-sterilized glucose solutions.


        • Graphical abstract from [1]
        • Chromatograms of the derivatized seven GDPs and a mixture (= spiked glucose solution) in the solvent 1,4-dioxane – toluene – glacial acetic acid 49:49:2 (V/V)

          02

          Chromatograms of the derivatized seven GDPs and a mixture (= spiked glucose solution) in the solvent 1,4-dioxane – toluene – glacial acetic acid 49:49:2 (V/V). The chromatograms are shown in UV 366 nm without (left) and with (right) subsequent 2nd derivatization with thymolsulfuric acid reagent at concentration levels of 0.5 mg/mL [1]. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode).

        • Overview of the obtained RF values and signal responses of each analyte at different wavelengths *without and **with second derivatization.

          03

          Overview of the obtained RF values and signal responses of each analyte at different wavelengths *without and **with second derivatization.

        • HPTLC chromatograms in UV 366 nm after both derivatizations (ROI until RF 0.6)

          04

          HPTLC chromatograms in UV 366 nm after both derivatizations (ROI until RF 0.6). Track 1 shows the spiked 5% glucose solution spiked GDP-Mix-OPD); tracks 2–8 the calibration solutions in ascending concentrations (1.0 μg/mL–100.0 μg/mL GDPs) [1]. All solutions contain 50 mg/mL glucose. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode).

        • Calibration curve of GO/MGO at concentrations of 2–150 μg/mL (measured in absorbance mode at 330 nm)

          05

          Calibration curve of GO/MGO at concentrations of 2–150 μg/mL (measured in absorbance mode at 330 nm) [1]. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode).

        Literature

        [1] Leitzen et al. PLoS ONE (2021), https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0253811

        Further information on request from the authors.

        Contact: Sarah Leitzen, Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices, Bonn, Germany, sarah.leitzen[at]bfarm.de

        mentioned products

        The following products were used in this case study

        Continue reading

        HPTLC detection of falsification in drugs

        Mrs. Carole Vrignaud and her colleagues at the Anti-counterfeiting Laboratory (LCAC) at Sanofi Tours, France, employ chromatographic separation techniques, especially HPTLC, to develop new qualitative analytical methods for detection of falsified drugs, in a variety of sample matrices. The world drug market is about 1000 billion € (2019). The World Health Organization (WHO) considers that half of the drugs sold through the internet are fakes. This is why Sanofi group in 2008 created this unique laboratory to fight against drug falsification using various analytical methods, including HPTLC. The main objective is to confirm the presence of active ingredients (API) or excipients (preservatives, flavoring…) in each Sanofi formulation. HPTLC is also often used to detect degradation of products stored under inappropriate conditions, as well as unexpected compounds, allowing characterization of the falsified products. To detect falsification of drugs, a generic HPTLC method was developed.

        HPTLC is well suited for a rapid parallel screening of many samples. Up to 10 samples can be analyzed in less than one hour. The developed method is simple and can be perform ed with little consumption of solvents and reagents.

        Standard solutions

        20 mg of API no. 1, 55 mg of API no. 2, 53 mg of API no. 3, and 51 mg of impurity of API no. 2 are individually dissolved in 10 mL of water (each).

        Sample preparation

        One tablet of each suspected case of falsification is milled, and then extracted with 7.5 mL of water by vortexing. After centrifugation, the filtered supernatant is transferred into a 5 mL volumetric flask and filled up to the mark.

        Chromatogram layer

        HPTLC plates silica gel 60 F254 (Merck), 20 x 10 cm, pre-washed with methanol, are used.

        Sample application

        Samples and standard solutions are applied as bands with the Automatic TLC Sampler (ATS 4), 14 tracks, band length 8.0 mm, distance from left edge 20.0 mm, distance from lower edge 8.0 mm. 1.0 μL of sample solutions and 3.0 μL of standard solutions are applied.

        Chromatography

        In the ADC 2 with chamber saturation (20 min) and after conditioning at 33% relative humidity for 10 min using a saturated solution of magnesium chloride, development with dichloromethane – ethanol – water – formic acid 9:9:1.5:0.25 (V/V) to the migration distance of 50 mm (from the lower edge), followed by drying for 5 min.

        Post-chromatographic derivatization

        First, the plates are manually sprayed with Dragendorff’s reagent (commercial solution) and dried for 60 s at room temperature. Second, the plates are manually sprayed with sodium nitrite solution (5%) and dried for 30 s at room temperature.

        Documentation

        Images of the plates are captured with the TLC Visualizer in UV 254 nm before derivatization and in white light after each derivatization step.

        Densitometry

        Absorbance measurement is performed with the TLC Scanner 3 and visionCATS at 272 nm, slit dimension 5.0 mm x 0.2 mm, measurement speed 20 mm/s, spectra recording from 200 to 450 nm.

        Results and discussion

        A representative plate with real samples is shown. During method development simulated and spiked samples gave the same RF values as the standards and were well separated from matrix components. Any positive identification of API no. 2 and no. 3 can be confirmed by spectral comparison of samples and standards as well as the expected presence of impurity of API no. 2. Detection of API no. 1 (cases no. 1–7) is achieved after derivatization in white light. Results are shown for selected drug products as well as the identification of three active ingredients expected in different oral formulations. HPTLC is also used to estimate each quantity. API no. 3 is not present in the composition of the original tablets (cases no. 8–9). However, some previous cases were identified as counterfeit tablets containing API no. 3 instead of API no. 2.

        In the shown real cases no falsification was detected. Nevertheless, the approach has proved suitable by several positive cases. HPTLC is therefore used at Sanofi as high throughput screening technique.


        • HPTLC chromatogram (top) in UV 254 nm prior to and (bottom) in white light after derivatization

          01

          HPTLC chromatogram (top) in UV 254 nm prior to and (bottom) in white light after derivatization; tracks 1&10: API no. 1; tracks 2–8: cases no. 1–7; track 9: API no. 3; track 11: API no. 2; track 12: impurity of API no. 2; tracks 13–14: cases no. 8–9

        • (Left) UV spectrum API no. 3 (red) and samples (cases no. 1-7); (right) UV spectrum API no. 2 (red) and samples (cases no. 8–9)

          02

          (Left) UV spectrum API no. 3 (red) and samples (cases no. 1-7); (right) UV spectrum API no. 2 (red) and samples (cases no. 8–9)

        Further information on request from the authors.

        Contact: Carole Vrignaud, 30-36 avenue Gustave Eiffel, 37100 Tours, France, carole.vrignaud[at]sanofi.com

        mentioned products

        The following products were used in this case study

        Continue reading

        WELCOME
        to the New CAMAG Website!
        👋
        We’re excited to guide you through the transition from our old website to the new and improved CAMAG platform.
        If you are a returning customer please be sure to read our onboarding instructions before you login.